Did you see this? You gotta be kidding but I don’t think it is a joke. Another one to get in touch with your legislators.

On June 22, 2007. Obama was in Manchester, N.H., campaigning for the Democratic presidential nomination, did he lie? Let’s find out in this 2 minute video.

I guess this does not line up with his actions since becoming president

A good lesson on our Christian heritage.

Also see http://www.bobpearcy.com/?p=101 for your state’s preamble to the constitution.

This is not mine, I did not write it. I got it at http://revolutionradio.org/2009/06/27/hr-45-criminalizing-gun-ownership/. They ask at the end to send it to everyone you know and I encourage you to do that also.

6-25-9

HR 45 Here It Comes America.

Here is the text of the bill…

http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h45/text

Congress is now starting on the firearms confiscation bill. If it passes, gun owners will become criminals if you don’t fully comply.

It has started.

Very Important for you to be aware of a new bill HR 45 introduced into the House. This is the Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sale Act of 2009.

Even gun shop owners didn’t know about this because the government is trying to fly it under the radar.

To find out about this – go to any government website and type in HR 45 or Google HR 45 Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sales Act of 2009. You will get all the information.

Basically this would make it illegal to own a firearm – any rifle with a clip or ANY pistol unless:

-It is registered -You are fingerprinted -You supply a current Driver’s License -You supply your Social Security # -You will submit to a physical & mental evaluation at any time of their choosing -Each update – change or ownership through private or public sale must be reported and costs $25 – Failure to do so you automatically lose the right to own a firearm and are subject up to a year in jail. -There is a child provision clause on page 16 section 305 stating a child-access provision. Gun must be locked and inaccessible to any child under 18. -They would have the right to come and inspect that you are storing your gun safely away from accessibility to children and fine is punishable for up to 5 yrs. in prison.

If you think this is a joke – go to the website and take your pick of many options to read this. It is long and lengthy. But, more and more people are becoming aware of this. Pass the word along. Any hunters in your family pass this along.

This is just a “termite” approach to complete confiscation of guns and disarming of our society to the point we will have no defense – chip away a little here and there until the goal is accomplished before anyone realizes it.

This is one to act on whether you own a gun or not.

If you take my gun, only the criminal will have one to use against me. HR 45 only makes me/us less safe. After working with convicts for 26 years I know this bill, if passed, would make them happy and in less danger from their victims.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.45

http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h45/show

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-45

Please.. copy and send this out to EVERYONE in the USA , whether you support the Right to Bear Arms or are for gun control. We all should have the right to choose.

Or as it is called out here in the real world ‘The Carbon Tax’. Congressman Mike Simpson sent this letter to a friend of mine.

June 26, 2009
Dear Robert:

Thank you for contacting me regarding H.R. 2454, the so-called American Clean Energy and Security Act.  I appreciate hearing from you and having the opportunity to respond.

I share the concern of many Idahoans for our environment and recognize that we must do what we can to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) where possible.  However, I have major concerns with H.R. 2454, which promises large tax increases, higher energy costs, and major job loses, all without any real improvements in climate conditions over the next 100 years.  This legislation is not a serious attempt to combat GHG emissions but is instead a political ploy that will be paid for by American families and do nothing to reduce our dependence on foreign oil.  As a result, I voted against it when it was considered on the floor of the House of Representatives.  The bill passed by a vote of 219-212 on June 26, 2009.

Instead of a carefully thought-out proposal to increase our energy independence and reduce GHG emissions in an effective and reasonable way, H.R. 2454 reads like an extremist wish-list of environmental mandates that are not coordinated and, in many ways, actually work against each other.  For example, the bill establishes a Renewable Energy Standard (RES) that mandates energy efficiency standards and requires energy companies to produce a certain percentage of energy and electricity from renewable sources, but it limits the definition of “renewable sources” for the RES to exclude hydropower and nuclear energy.  The fact that Democrats would not even allow a vote on nuclear energy proves that this bill is not really about combating climate change—it is about establishing an energy economy that punishes activities and industries they don’t like.

In addition, there is widespread concern that unless growing economies like China and India participate in a cap and trade system to limit GHG emissions similar to the one created by the bill, U.S. industries will be unable to compete on the world stage and American jobs will be forced overseas.  The bill depends on technologies, like carbon capture and sequestration, that are still largely unavailable and untested.  It would heavily subsidize purchase of electric or plug-in hybrid vehicles, while electricity prices would skyrocket under the mandates put into place by the bill.

This is likely the most consequential issue Congress will consider this year, yet the Democrats allowed only one amendment and three hours of debate on a bill that we saw for the first time only a few days before it was considered on the House floor.  They rushed an enormous bill to the floor without any real idea of what impact it will have on our economy, competitiveness, and way of life.  This is a classic example of Congress rushing to fix a problem it doesn’t fully understand and implement a solution it hasn’t fully considered.

Instead of creating a host of government mandates and forcing consumers to foot the bill for this legislation, I support using technology, incentives, and innovation to move our economy to a sustainable, independent energy source.  I believe that to do so we must look at all the options, including renewable energy, nuclear energy, and domestic oil production.  This is why I am a cosponsor of H.R. 2828, the American Energy Innovation Act, comprehensive energy legislation that represents a fiscally responsible approach to reducing our dependence on foreign energy, providing a cleaner environment, and putting Americans to work.  By encouraging innovation, promoting conservation and efficiency without government mandates, and increasing production of American energy through nuclear energy production, this legislation is a real solution to the challenges facing our nation.

These are real problems, and they must be addressed in a common sense, thoughtful way.  I look forward to the debate Congress will continue to have on this issue, and I appreciate your comments about this legislation.

Once again, thank you for taking the time to contact me about this issue.  As your representative in Congress, it is important to me to know your thoughts and opinions about issues affecting our nation today.  I also encourage you to visit my website, www.house.gov/simpson, to sign up for my e-newsletter and to read more about my views on a variety of issues.

Sincerely,

Mike Simpson

Member of Congress

I am really concerned and some of you have probably already read my post in Facebook to Senator Mike Crapo of Idaho.  The Senator said in his e-news today — This month we celebrate the 233rd birthday of the United States of America!  On July 4, 1776, our great nation claimed our independence from Britain, and our democracy was born. — underline is mine.
How can a U.S. senator call the U.S.A. a democracy? Does he not know the difference between a democracy and a republic? If the people we send to Washington don’t even know what we are why are they there. Maybe we need to give candidates for senators and representives and president a aptitude test before they can run for office.

I know this is a little thing compared to what we have in the white house but it is so close to home. I invited Senator Crapo to watch the movie on this site at http://www.bobpearcy.com/?p=166 about the difference in the two and why our founding fathers chose it to be a republic.

As a side note, tomorrow they are supposed to vote on the “carbon tax” which will probably break us if the rest of the shenanigans don’t do it. If you have not called you congressman please do so early on Friday June 26, 2009.
Bob Pearcy