<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bob&#039;s Blog &#187; Speaker Of The House Nancy Pelosi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bobpearcy.com/tag/speaker-of-the-house-nancy-pelosi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bobpearcy.com</link>
	<description>The World Around Us</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:16:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>We Don&#8217;t Need or Want A Constitutional Convention</title>
		<link>http://www.bobpearcy.com/we-dont-need-or-want-a-constitutional-convention/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bobpearcy.com/we-dont-need-or-want-a-constitutional-convention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Pearcy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns & Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walk with God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Butch Otter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hi Bob]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office Of The Governor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Otter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right To Keep And Bear Arms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Majority Leader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Majority Leader Harry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speaker Of The House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speaker Of The House Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Of Idaho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U S Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bobpearcy.com/?p=447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just sent this email to Gov Otter and believe everyone needs to see the following. We need to STOP obama from changing the Constitution For The United States of America To the office of the governor of the great state of Idaho, Gov Butch Otter Hi, Bob Pearcy here from Nampa, Here is email [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div dir="ltr"><strong>I just sent this email to Gov Otter and believe everyone needs to see the following. We need to STOP obama from changing the Constitution For The United States of America<br />
</strong></div>
<div dir="ltr"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span>To the  office of the governor of the great state of Idaho, Gov Butch  Otter </span></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" lang="en-us"><span style="font-family: Tahoma;"> </span></p>
<div><span style="font-family: Tahoma;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span>Hi, Bob Pearcy here from  Nampa, <span><span style="color: #0000ff;"> <span style="color: #000000;">Here is email from United States Justice Foundation</span>. </span></span></span><span>My question is &#8211; why have  we asked for a constitutional convention and why under the present circumstances  in WA are we not rescinding our vote for one?<span><span style="color: #0000ff;"> <span style="color: #000000;">Also I would like to know when did we ask  for a con-con and for what reason?</span></span></span></span></span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Tahoma;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span><span>Please pass this on to Gov. Otter and whomever else  may give us some enlightenment on this. I will keep my readers updated on  	<a href="unsaved:///../">www.bobpearcy.com</a>.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Tahoma;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span><span> </span></span></span></span></div>
<div><span><span style="font-family: Tahoma;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Thanks<span><span style="color: #0000ff;"> </span></span></span></span></span></div>
<div><span><span style="font-family: Tahoma;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span> </span></span></span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Tahoma;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span>Bob  Pearcy</span></span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Tahoma;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span><strong>I am sending the following in it&#8217;s entirety</strong></p>
<p></span></span></span></div>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span> </span></span></div>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top">&#8212; On <strong>Thu, 8/13/09, United States Justice Foundation  <em>&lt;info@usjfalerts.net&gt;</em></strong> wrote:</p>
<blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid #1010ff; padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px;"><p>From:  United States Justice Foundation &lt;info@usjfalerts.net&gt; Subject: Obama&#8217;s  Biggest Con &#8230; A Constitutional Convention Date: Thursday, August 13, 2009,  6:13 PM</p></blockquote>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p align="center"><img src="http://news.dienerconsultants.com/cimages/f87317c1e3c984e8afa2aaf2c74d402b/USJF.jpg" alt="USJF We Dont Need or Want A Constitutional Convention"  title="We Dont Need or Want A Constitutional Convention" /></p>
<p>HTML clipboard</p>
<p align="center"><span style="font-family: arial;"><span style="font-size: medium;">BARACK OBAMA AND HIS ALLIES ARE TRYING TO CHANGE  THE U.S. CONSTITUTION: <em>HELP US <span style="text-decoration: underline;">STOP</span> A NEW  CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION!</em> </span> </span> <span style="font-family: arial;">Dear Friend,  <strong>BARACK OBAMA AND HIS ALLIES ARE TRYING  TO CHANGE THE U.S. CONSTITUTION <span style="text-decoration: underline;">WITHOUT FOLLOWING THE</span> AMENDMENT PROCESS  &#8212; IN FACT, THEY&#8217;RE TRYING TO REWRITE THE <span style="text-decoration: underline;">ENTIRE CONSTITUTION</span> &#8212; AND  THEY&#8217;RE CLOSE TO SUCCEEDING!</strong> What would you think if an  amendment to the U.S. Constitution was introduced by liberal Democrat Speaker of  the House Nancy Pelosi, which <span style="text-decoration: underline;">repealed the First Amendment</span> in the Bill of  Rights &#8212; taking away our right to <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Free Speech</span></strong>?  What would you think if an amendment to the U.S. Constitution was  introduced by liberal Democrat Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, which  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">repealed the Second Amendment</span> in the Bill of Rights &#8212; taking away our  right to <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Keep and Bear Arms</span></strong>? (A right that the U.S.  Supreme Court recently upheld!)  &#8220;That could never happen,&#8221; you say. &#8220;No  one would allow it!&#8221; Right? Well&#8230;  Did you know that there are  <strong>TWO ways</strong> that our Constitution can be changed? And did you know  that Pelosi, Reid and Barack Obama are using the <span style="text-decoration: underline;">less</span> well-known way,  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">without</span> having to actually introduce amendments?  <strong>IT&#8217;S  TRUE &#8212; and WE have to stop it NOW!</strong> One way to change the  Constitution is to go through the amendment process &#8212; a long and tedious  process requiring two-thirds of both houses of Congress to pass an amendment,  and then three-fourths of the states to ratify it.  That means a  &#8220;super-majority&#8221; of our representatives at the National and State levels would  have to be in favor of the amendment &#8212; which safeguards us from the possibility  of really &#8220;bad&#8221; amendments.  BUT&#8230; there is <span style="text-decoration: underline;">one other way</span> that  our Constitution can be changed&#8230; and it DOES <span style="text-decoration: underline;">NOT</span> require all of those  elected representatives to be in favor of it. It&#8217;s called a  <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Constitutional Convention</span></strong>, and all that it requires is  34 states to ask Congress to call one.  In fact, right now, all that is  needed is for <span style="text-decoration: underline;">two more states</span> to ask for a Constitutional Convention&#8230;  and the basic law of the land could be <span style="text-decoration: underline;">changed forever</span> by Barack Obama,  Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid! </span></p>
<p align="center"><span style="font-family: arial;"><strong>WE NEED <span style="text-decoration: underline;">YOUR</span> HELP, RIGHT NOW, TO STOP BARACK  OBAMA AND HIS ALLIES FROM CHANGING THE U.S. CONSTITUTION: <span style="font-size: large;"><a rel="nofollow" href="http://news.dienerconsultants.com/ct/3303563:4577152517:m:1:154978388:D00B2F2696FC1BF431239BC3A2BFF55F" target="_blank">CLICK HERE NOW!</a></span> </strong> </span> <span style="font-family: arial;">Most people don&#8217;t realize that Article V of the Constitution requires  Congress to call a new Constitutional Convention (a &#8220;Con Con&#8221;) if two-thirds (or  34) of the states request it. We&#8217;ve only had one other &#8220;Con Con&#8221; in our history:  the one where the original Constitution was written in 1787!  The  language of Article V is mandatory: it says that Congress &#8220;shall call a  Convention for proposing Amendments&#8221; whenever requests are received from  two-thirds of the states. Note that the word &#8220;amendments&#8221; is used in the plural.  These are the <span style="text-decoration: underline;">only instructions</span> we have about a Constitutional  Convention. There are no other rules or guidelines.  We don&#8217;t know how a  Constitutional Convention would be apportioned, or how the delegates would be  elected. We don&#8217;t know what rules the Convention would operate under. We don&#8217;t  know whether changes to the Constitution could be proposed by a simple majority,  or would require a super majority, of those attending. We don&#8217;t know if the  agenda could be limited or would be wide open to any proposal.  <strong>We don&#8217;t know ANYTHING about how a Con Con would work</strong> &#8212; which means that it will come down to Congress setting the rules!  <strong>And Congress is controlled by the most radically liberal  Democrats in American history!</strong> Is <span style="text-decoration: underline;">that</span> who we want to be in  charge of a new Constitutional Convention?  Do we want BARACK OBAMA,  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">NANCY PELOSI</span>, and <span style="text-decoration: underline;">HARRY REID</span> to completely rewrite our most basic  document of law? </span></p>
<p align="center"><span style="font-family: arial;"><strong>WE NEED <span style="text-decoration: underline;">YOUR</span> HELP, RIGHT NOW, TO STOP BARACK  OBAMA AND HIS ALLIES FROM CHANGING THE U.S. CONSTITUTION: <span style="font-size: large;"><a rel="nofollow" href="http://news.dienerconsultants.com/ct/3303563:4577152517:m:1:154978388:D00B2F2696FC1BF431239BC3A2BFF55F" target="_blank">CLICK HERE NOW!</a></span> </strong> </span> <span style="font-family: arial;">The fact is, under the vague language of Article V, a Constitutional  Convention <span style="text-decoration: underline;">cannot</span> be limited. It would be <span style="text-decoration: underline;">wide open</span>, and able to  consider <span style="text-decoration: underline;">ANY</span> change in the Constitution that was proposed!  Former  U. S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Warren Burger once said, &#8220;There is no  effective way to limit or muzzle the actions of a Constitutional Convention. The  convention could make its own rules and set its own agenda.&#8221;  The  Stanford Law School Professor whose case-book is used in the majority of U.S.  law schools, Gerald Gunther, said that, even if Congress tried to limit the  Convention to one subject, the delegates could decide for themselves that the  Convention &#8220;is entitled to set its own agenda.&#8221;  This means that, even if  supporters of a &#8220;Con Con&#8221; claim that the convention would only cover one issue  &#8212; whether it&#8217;s a balanced budget amendment or removing the requirement that to  be eligible to serve as President, one must be a &#8220;natural born citizen,&#8221; or  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">anything else</span> &#8212; there is <span style="text-decoration: underline;">NO WAY</span> to stop the Convention from  changing EVERYTHING that we hold dear in America!  Barack Obama and his  far-left supporters would be able to get THEIR people appointed as delegates to  the Convention, so that THEIR agendas would be the Convention&#8217;s agenda, and  THEIR plans for socialism in America would come to pass.  <strong>Say  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">BYE-BYE</span> to the First Amendment&#8217;s <span style="text-decoration: underline;">freedom of speech</span> &#8212; Rush  Limbaugh and Sean Hannity could be taken off the air.  Say <span style="text-decoration: underline;">BYE-BYE</span> to the Second Amendment&#8217;s <span style="text-decoration: underline;">right to bear arms</span> &#8212; a total gun ban could be  the law of the land!  Say BYE-BYE to the Constitution&#8217;s requirement that  to serve as President a man or a woman must be a &#8220;natural born citizen&#8221;! </strong> You <span style="text-decoration: underline;">KNOW</span> that&#8217;s what they&#8217;ll do if given the chance &#8212;  and we&#8217;re only <span style="text-decoration: underline;">TWO STATES AWAY</span> from seeing a Constitutional Convention  convened!  You see, Article V says that it takes a request from  two-thirds of the states to force a &#8220;Con Con&#8221; &#8212; but it <span style="text-decoration: underline;">doesn&#8217;t</span> say  there&#8217;s any <span style="text-decoration: underline;">time limit</span> on getting to that total!  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Thirty-two  states</span> have already issued a call for a &#8220;Con Con&#8221; over the last few  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">decades</span>, including Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado,  Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland,  Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North  Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South  Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, and Wyoming.  <strong>It only  takes <span style="text-decoration: underline;">34 states</span> to REQUIRE a Constitutional Convention be  convened!</strong> Some states, like Georgia, Virginia, and others, have  since voted to &#8220;rescind&#8221; their call for a &#8220;Con Con&#8221; &#8212; BUT <span style="text-decoration: underline;">no one</span> is sure  whether those &#8220;rescission&#8221; votes are actually Constitutional&#8230;so the danger is  REAL! </span></p>
<p align="center"><span style="font-family: arial;"><strong>WE NEED <span style="text-decoration: underline;">YOUR</span> HELP, RIGHT NOW, TO STOP BARACK  OBAMA AND HIS ALLIES FROM CHANGING THE U.S. CONSTITUTION: <span style="font-size: large;"><a rel="nofollow" href="http://news.dienerconsultants.com/ct/3303563:4577152517:m:1:154978388:D00B2F2696FC1BF431239BC3A2BFF55F" target="_blank">CLICK HERE NOW!</a></span> </strong> </span> <span style="font-family: arial;">The United States Justice Foundation is launching a <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">major  campaign</span></strong> to STOP a &#8220;Con Con&#8221; from taking place &#8212; WE MUST CREATE a  tremendous outpouring of publicity and public scrutiny to be given to this  danger, so that Barack Obama and his radical liberal allies can&#8217;t &#8220;sneak this  past us&#8221; without anyone noticing, until it&#8217;s too late. Right now, our staff is  conducting legal and historical research, and preparing legal opinions, to  submit to every state legislature, if necessary, and we&#8217;ll be offering to  represent any state, or state legislator, in fighting the Con-Con based on those  documents.  We&#8217;re also going to be leading a grassroots effort to attack  this issue at both the state and federal levels: At the state level, leading the  charge in every state to either NOT VOTE for a &#8220;Con Con&#8221; (if they haven&#8217;t voted  yet) or to RESCIND their past vote in favor (if they have). And, at the federal  level, we&#8217;ll be mobilizing citizens across the country to contact their  Representatives and Senators to DEMAND that they come out, NOW, and announce  their support for a state&#8217;s right to rescind, and that they won&#8217;t support a call  for a &#8220;Con-Con.&#8221; In addition, we&#8217;ll be calling on the Attorney General of the  United States, and the Attorney General of each and every State that has passed  a &#8220;Con-Con&#8221; resolution, to issue an official Opinion on the legality of  rescission.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">THIS DANGER IS REAL</span>. The Constitutional Convention of  1787 was called for the exclusive purpose of amending the Articles of  Confederation. Once the Founding Fathers assembled in Philadelphia, however,  they threw out the Articles of Confederation and wrote an entirely new  Constitution, and even changed the ratification procedure so they could get it  adopted more easily. The 1787 Convention is the only precedent we have for a  national Constitutional Convention.  There&#8217;s no guarantee that all of the  changes to our Constitution passed at a Constitutional Convention would need to  be ratified by 34 states this time &#8212; if a &#8220;Con Con&#8221; can change our structure of  government as defined in Articles I, II, and III, of the Constitution, then it  can also change the Article V requirement that three-fourths of the states are  needed to ratify any changes. The Convention of 1787 reduced the number of  states required to ratify a change from 100% of the states to 75%, and a  Convention today could &#8220;follow their example&#8221; and reduce it further, to 66%, or  60%, or even 51%!  WE MUST NOT LET THIS HAPPEN!  There&#8217;s <span style="text-decoration: underline;">very  little time</span> to ramp this project up to FULL SPEED &#8212; we need to raise at  least <strong>$100,000</strong> to prepare and distribute legal opinions, lobby  state legislators and begin our grassroots activism campaign <span style="text-decoration: underline;">this coming  month</span>. Please, <strong><a rel="nofollow" href="http://news.dienerconsultants.com/ct/3303563:4577152517:m:1:154978388:D00B2F2696FC1BF431239BC3A2BFF55F" target="_blank">CLICK HERE NOW</a></strong> to make your best  possible donation, and let&#8217;s STOP Obama, Pelosi and Reid from ripping our  Constitution to shreds, and re-writing it to their own socialist goals!  Sincerely, <img src="http://news.dienerconsultants.com/cimages/f87317c1e3c984e8afa2aaf2c74d402b/sig_garykreep.jpg" alt="sig garykreep We Dont Need or Want A Constitutional Convention"  title="We Dont Need or Want A Constitutional Convention" /> Gary Kreep, Executive Director United States Justice  Foundation  P.S. President Barack Obama has already expressed his belief  that the U.S. Constitution needs to be interpreted in the context of current  affairs and events. Can you <em>imagine</em> what he and his supporters would DO  to that document if given the chance to <em>re-write it completely</em>? Our Bill  of Rights could <em>disappear</em> overnight!  In fact, all the way back in  2006, Obama already had his <a rel="nofollow" href="http://news.dienerconsultants.com/ct/3303564:4577152517:m:1:154978388:D00B2F2696FC1BF431239BC3A2BFF55F" target="_blank">lawyers</a> researching how someone could <a rel="nofollow" href="http://news.dienerconsultants.com/ct/3303565:4577152517:m:1:154978388:D00B2F2696FC1BF431239BC3A2BFF55F" target="_blank">get around</a> the eligibility requirements to serve  as U.S. President &#8212; these people simply don&#8217;t CARE about whether we preserve  the supreme law of the land!  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Remember</span> &#8212; when the last  Constitutional Convention met in 1787, the original goal was to amend the  Articles of Confederation. Instead, delegates simply <span style="text-decoration: underline;">threw them out</span> and  wrote a whole <span style="text-decoration: underline;">new Constitution</span>.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">That&#8217;s EXACTLY what Obama,  Pelosi and Reid would do this time</span> &#8212; but this time, the result would  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">destroy</span> our freedoms. Please, <a rel="nofollow" href="http://news.dienerconsultants.com/ct/3303563:4577152517:m:1:154978388:D00B2F2696FC1BF431239BC3A2BFF55F" target="_blank">CLICK HERE NOW</a> to help us STOP them. Thank you! </span></p>
<p align="center"><span style="font-family: arial;"><strong>WE NEED <span style="text-decoration: underline;">YOUR</span> HELP, RIGHT NOW, TO STOP BARACK  OBAMA AND HIS ALLIES FROM CHANGING THE U.S. CONSTITUTION: <span style="font-size: large;"><a rel="nofollow" href="http://news.dienerconsultants.com/ct/3303563:4577152517:m:1:154978388:D00B2F2696FC1BF431239BC3A2BFF55F" target="_blank">CLICK HERE NOW!</a></span> </strong> </span></p>
<p align="center"><span style="font-family: arial;"><em>To donate by check, make payable to: United States Justice  Foundation 932 D Street Suite 1 Ramona, CA 92065 </em></span></p>
<p align="center"><span style="font-family: arial;"><strong>I have listed this post in every category since the subject can affect every aspect of our lives, BP</strong><em><br />
</em></span></p>
<p align="center">
<table border="0" width="620" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr></tr>
<tr></tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://www.bobpearcy.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bobpearcy.com/we-dont-need-or-want-a-constitutional-convention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
