http://saddleupamerica.ning.com/forum/topics/us-constitution-was-suspended

I found this at -

THE NEW AMERICAN — February 5, 1996
Copyright 1996 — American Opinion Publishing, Incorporated
P.O. Box 8040, Appleton, WI  54913

ARTICLE: Nation
TITLE: Is the Constitution Suspended?
AUTHOR: Thomas A. Burzynski

In recent years, an ever-increasing number of alarming rumors
have been paraded before Americans concerning their nation’s
future. Fears of United Nations forces in Montana, a
concentration camp in downtown Indianapolis, and black
helicopters everywhere are but a few of the sensational stories
that have been spread through talk radio, the Internet, and
tabloid newspapers.

The most recent addition to this maelstrom of false alarms offers
the theory that the U.S. Constitution has been suspended since
1933 through a declaration of national emergency by President
Franklin Roosevelt.

This alarming assertion is being promoted
chiefly by Dr. Eugene Schroder, a Colorado veterinarian, through
his book Constitution: Fact or Fiction. According to a biography
provided by his publisher, Dr. Schroder “uncovered the use of
emergency powers to set aside the Constitution” several years ago
and has been investigating the situation ever since. Dr.
Schroder’s efforts to publicize the issue have been boosted by
interviews in the Spotlight and Anti-Shyster publications as well
as through appearances on talk-radio programs.

Dr. Schroder has apparently influenced others. Larry Pratt,
executive director of Gun Owners of America (GOA), endorsed and
recommended Dr. Schroder’s work, declaring that “America needs to
read this book!” GOA has released a video, Enemy Public Number
One, which mirrors the arguments of Dr. Schroder. Likewise, the
Republican Party of Texas, the nation’s largest state Republican
party, issued a resolution claiming that the Constitution has
been suspended and calling for its restoration. John Tello, a
member of the executive committee of the Texas Republican Party
and the primary backer of the resolution, told The New American,

“Dr. Eugene Schroder worked with us.” Seemingly, these groups
have taken Dr. Schroder’s theory as fact without checking the
accuracy of the information on which it is based.

                          The Schroder Theory

According to Schroder, the foundation for the current crisis was
laid on October 6, 1917 with the passage of the Trading With the
Enemy Act. This act gave the President the power to regulate,
during time of war, all financial transactions involving any
“individual, partnership, or body of individuals residing within
any nation with which the U.S. is at war.” On March 9, 1933, five
days after Roosevelt’s inauguration and four days after he had
declared a national emergency, Congress passed the Emergency
Banking Act, which amended the Trading With the Enemy Act to
include regulation of transactions not only with the enemy but
also between Americans during time of war or national emergency.

Since FDR had already declared a national emergency to deal with
the bank “crisis,” this unconstitutional legislation immediately
gave the President much of the confidence he needed to launch the
economic segment of his “New Deal” agenda. The result, of course,
was an assault on the traditional form of American government and
the free enterprise system under which America had flourished.

FDR’s declaration of a national emergency has never been
terminated and has been joined by numerous other declarations of
national emergency by subsequent presidents. Dr. Schroder cites
this, as well as various government reports and laws, as “proof”
that our nation has slipped into an “unconstitutional
dictatorship.” But as we shall see, he overlooks the fact that
the Constitution is the supreme law of the land and cannot be
suspended or superseded via a law or presidential decree. In
effect, he confuses violations of the Constitution with a
suspension of the Constitution.

                            Fact and Fiction

One piece of Schroder’s documentation comes from a 1973 Senate
report which ominously stated:

“Since March 9, 1933, the United States has been in a state of
declared national emergency…. Under powers delegated …
[during a national emergency] the President may: seize property;
organize and control the means of production; seize commodities;
assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and
control all transportation and communication; regulate the
operation of private enterprise; restrict travel; and, in a
plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American
citizens.”

Aside from being unconstitutional, the level of tyranny described
by this 22-year-old Senate report has never been reached. Harold
Relyea, a specialist in American national government with the
Congressional Research Service, explained to The New American:
“The emergency declared in 1933 still exists as a matter of law
but not as a matter of policy. It has never been terminated but
all authority conferred by the declaration has gone into
dormancy.”

In his book Constitution: Fact or Fiction, Dr. Schroder contends:
“The [U.S.] Constitution can be suspended by any president of the
US who ascertains and proclaims a widespread territorial revolt.”

This claim, however, is not sustained by the Constitution itself,
which is the sole legitimate source of federal power. The writ of
habeas corpus, as specified in Article I, section 9, is the lone
provision of the Constitution which may be suspended — and even
then, only in “cases of rebellion or invasion.” Under the
Constitution the writ could be suspended during a period of
national emergency only if the national emergency in question
were a “rebellion or invasion.” As Relyea emphasized to The New
American, “The Constitution has never been suspended.”

So how does Schroder reach his conclusion in light of the
Constitution? Largely by way of faulty research. For instance,
one of the primary pieces of evidence he cites involves Title 12,
Section 95(b) of the United States Code. Writes Schroder:

“[I]f we went to the library today and picked up a copy of 12 USC
and went to section 95(b) … we will find a law which states:
‘The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and
proclamations heretofore or hereafter taken, promulgated, made,
or issued by the President of the United States or the Secretary
of the Treasury since March 4, 1933, pursuant to the authority
conferred by subsection (b) of section 5 of the Act of October 6,
1917 [Trading With the Enemy Act], as amended, are hereby
approved and confirmed.’ “

Schroder claims that this section of the U.S. Code means that
everything the President or the Secretary of the Treasury has
done since March 4, 1933 and anything that the President or the
Secretary of the Treasury is hereafter going to do is
automatically “approved and confirmed.”

However, research reveals that Dr. Schroder is wrong. Doing as he
suggests, this author went to the library, picked up a copy of
Title 12 USC, and went to section 95(b), where he found the
following:

“The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and
proclamations heretofore or hereafter taken, promulgated, made,
or issued by the President of the United States or the Secretary
of the Treasury since March 4, 1933, pursuant to the authority
conferred by section 95a of this title, are approved and
confirmed.”

Looking in section 95(b) of USC Title 12, this writer found, in
place of Dr. Schroder’s reference to the 1917 Trading With the
Enemy Act, a reference to “section 95(a) of this title.” Section
95(a) refers only to a time of war, not to a period of national
emergency. Dr. Schroder quoted from an outdated version of the
U.S. Code.

In addition, the 1995 resolution passed by the Texas Republicans
contains the very same error. John Tello told The New American
that Schroder “became aware of the change in 1987.” But Tello
added that the change in this law is reflected neither in his
resolution nor in Schroder’s book because they both believe the
government is still operating under the older phraseology.

                       Ignoring the Constitution

The current emergency power supplied to the President and the
Secretary of the Treasury by section 95(a) authorizes them to
regulate America’s banking system, even to order the closing of
banks. But such powers are clearly unconstitutional on two
counts: The Constitution contains no authorization for any
federal authority to declare a national emergency, and it
likewise contains no authorization for regulating or closing
banks. The absence of such grants of power in the body of the
Constitution are, of course, reinforced by the Tenth Amendment.

Therefore, the Constitution cannot be suspended as Dr. Schroder
believes. Instead, its fundamental limitations are being ignored
and the power of the executive branch of government is being
permitted to grow to ominous proportions.

Dr. Schroder makes another misstep when he cites the Trading With
the Enemy Act. To buttress his claim that we live in a
dictatorship brought on via the use of emergency powers, he cites
the following portion of the act: “During time of war or during
any other period of national emergency declared by the President,
the President may …” regulate to the point of prohibiting any
transaction involving Americans. But even this portion of the
act, though always unconstitutional, was amended in 1977 to read:
“During time of war, the President may….” What was deleted from
the original by the 1977 amendment, of course, is the reference
to a “national emergency declared by the President.”

In 1976 Congress passed the National Emergencies Termination Act,
which specified that any national emergency not extended by the
President on an annual basis will be automatically terminated.
Also, the act recognized the power of Congress to terminate a
national emergency. Schroder claims that the national emergency
declared by FDR in 1933 was expressly exempted from this act. But
he fails to note that this exemption was done away with one year
later in a measure amending the Trading With the Enemy Act.

                            Danger of Rumors

The rumor of a suspended Constitution represents only the latest
in what has become a labyrinth of false trails and dead-ends, all
with the potential to confuse and neutralize well-meaning
conservatives. Mysterious executive orders prohibiting food
hoarding, undue concern about yellow fringes around the American
flag, and tales of Russian weather modification all damage the
credibility of otherwise effective conservative activists. But
the rumor that the Constitution has already been suspended
delivers a double blow to the conservative movement since it is
not only patently false, but is infecting good Americans with a
sense of hopelessness. If the Constitution has been suspended,
then constituent pressure on congressmen is useless, all checks
and balances designed into our system of government no longer
apply, and the government is incapable of safeguarding our
God-given rights.

Fortunately, as long as the Constitution still stands, any
government action that is based on extra-constitutional powers is
ipso facto unconstitutional. What America needs are congressional
declarations that expose as nullities all illegally usurped
powers. In addition, the people must learn to resist the
distractions of the rumor mill and, instead, generate constant
and informed vigilance lest their freedoms disappear at the hands
of those who always claim that they mean to rule well, but who
most of all mean always to rule.

                             END OF ARTICLE

THE NEW AMERICAN — February 5, 1996
Copyright 1996 — American Opinion Publishing, Incorporated
P.O. Box 8040, Appleton, WI  54913
 

************************************************************

In an outrageous example of the abuse of near dictatorial power, the leader of the United States Senate, Harry Reid, forced a vote on nationalized health care. With total disregard for the will of the people and turning a blind eye to the United States Constitution, Reid sought passage for this bill by corrupting the legislative system.

“This process is not legislation. This process is corruption,” said Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., referring to the last-minute blitz of dirty deal making that enabled Obama to lock in the 60 votes needed to pass the bill.

The final hold out was Nebraska Sen. Ben Nelson. But he hit the jackpot when they bought his yes vote, scoring $45 million to completely cover Nebraska’s Medicaid bill every year into the indefinite future.

Clearly this deal violates Article 1 Section 9 part 6 of the Constitution which says: “No preference shall be given by any Regulation of Commerce or Revenue to the Ports of one state over another…” and Article 4 Section 2 which says: “The Citizens of each state shall be entitled to all the Privileges and Immunities of the Citizens in the several states.”

Citizens of Nebraska will now have state medical bills, other states must pay, funded courtesy of the United States government (meaning you and me.) Nebraskans are clearly receiving a special privilege. According to this monstrosity, they are more equal than other Americans.

Sitting on high, the President encouraged this corrupt, ugly spectacle. Not only that, he broke the vow he took to uphold the US Constitution as he raised his hand and recited his oath of office.

While we all sleep, the U.S. Senate is stripping us of our freedom. Clearly the time for impeachment is at hand. Reid and Pelosi deserve to be removed right along with Obama.

All these outrages only fuel our efforts. The citizenry is in full revolt.

I am proud that our campaign for impeachment is growing stronger by the hour. We have surpassed 100,000 signatures and are fast approaching 125,000 signatures. This movement cannot be stopped by the corrupt deals in Washington. We will succeed, and the socialist dreams of our president will end on the ash heap of history.

Thank you for continuing to post the links to the impeachment petition. Remember, most people will not sign until they have seen the link ten times or more, so we need to continue pushing. Here is the link: http://tinyurl.com/ygz4wfe

We have also posted a special page which will provide the HTML code for banner ads. If you have a blog or website, please consider posting these ads. They have been very successful recruiting new people to our cause. Here is the special page: 

http://www.c4strategies.com/ImpeachObama/affiliates.html

With gratitude in our hearts from our unprecedented success, we approach the celebration of our Saviors’ birth on Christmas day. The New Year brings us to the next mile-stone of this campaign. If we are to succeed, the 2010 elections must bring to office a pro-impeachment majority.

Every day Barack Hussein Obama occupies the White House, America is in grave danger. 

Warm regards,

_____________________________________________________________________________________

The people looking in can see the problem, why can’t the people in the U.S.A.?

This from the Telegraph in UK

Gerald Warner

Gerald Warner is an author, broadcaster, columnist and polemical commentator who writes about politics, religion, history, culture and society in general.

Barack Obama and the CIA: why does President Pantywaist hate America so badly?

By Gerald Warner Politics Last updated: April 24th, 2009

167 Comments

If al-Qaeda, the Taliban and the rest of the Looney Tunes brigade want to kick America to death, they had better move in quickly and grab a piece of the action before Barack Obama finishes the job himself. Never in the history of the United States has a president worked so actively against the interests of his own people – not even Jimmy Carter.

Obama’s problem is that he does not know who the enemy is. To him, the enemy does not squat in caves in Waziristan, clutching automatic weapons and reciting the more militant verses from the Koran: instead, it sits around at tea parties in Kentucky quoting from the US Constitution. Obama is not at war with terrorists, but with his Republican fellow citizens. He has never abandoned the campaign trail.

That is why he opened Pandora’s Box by publishing the Justice Department’s legal opinions on waterboarding and other hardline interrogation techniques. He cynically subordinated the national interest to his partisan desire to embarrass the Republicans. Then he had to rush to Langley, Virginia to try to reassure a demoralised CIA that had just discovered the President of the United States was an even more formidable foe than al-Qaeda.

“Don’t be discouraged by what’s happened the last few weeks,” he told intelligence officers. Is he kidding? Thanks to him, al-Qaeda knows the private interrogation techniques available to the US intelligence agencies and can train its operatives to withstand them – or would do so, if they had not already been outlawed.

So, next time a senior al-Qaeda hood is captured, all the CIA can do is ask him nicely if he would care to reveal when a major population centre is due to be hit by a terror spectacular, or which American city is about to be irradiated by a dirty bomb. Your view of this situation will be dictated by one simple criterion: whether or not you watched the people jumping from the twin towers.

Obama promised his CIA audience that nobody would be prosecuted for past actions. That has already been contradicted by leftist groups with a revanchist ambition to put Republicans, headed if possible by Condoleezza Rice, in the dock. Talk about playing party politics with national security. Martin Scheinin, the United Nations special investigator for human rights, claims that senior figures, including former vice president Dick Cheney, could face prosecution overseas. Ponder that – once you have got over the difficulty of locating the United Nations and human rights within the same dimension.

President Pantywaist Obama should have thought twice before sitting down to play poker with Dick Cheney. The former vice president believes documents have been selectively published and that releasing more will prove how effective the interrogation techniques were. Under Dubya’s administration, there was no further atrocity on American soil after 9/11.

President Pantywaist’s recent world tour, cosying up to all the bad guys, excited the ambitions of America’s enemies. Here, they realised, is a sucker they can really take to the cleaners. His only enemies are fellow Americans. Which prompts the question: why does President Pantywaist hate America so badly?

Radical ObamaCzars and the First US Imperium