<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Don&#8217;t Need or Want A Constitutional Convention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bobpearcy.com/we-dont-need-or-want-a-constitutional-convention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bobpearcy.com/we-dont-need-or-want-a-constitutional-convention/</link>
	<description>The World Around Us</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:30:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Stone</title>
		<link>http://www.bobpearcy.com/we-dont-need-or-want-a-constitutional-convention/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Stone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 07:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bobpearcy.com/?p=447#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Consider California 8-22-09

Californians need to be vigilant a State Constitutional Convention, does not result in circumventing or burying Prop.13, the passed ballot measure that caps real estate taxes. Note the article stated: The benefits of a constitutional convention, rather than a series of ballot measures, would be a more inclusive process, avoiding conflicted interests... 

California&#039; budge deficit and relentless history to overspend, is scaring away investors and potential employers from CA. Some employers and Investors believe CA is no longer safe to invest money. What investors do see, is a growing welfare state that will continually raise taxes. Until CA gets serious about enforcing budget restraints, many investors and potential employers will not consider California. It is foreseeable, that if a Health Insurance Bill is passed, unauthorized immigrants not covered by Health Insurance might burden CA taxpayer paid medical services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider California 8-22-09</p>
<p>Californians need to be vigilant a State Constitutional Convention, does not result in circumventing or burying Prop.13, the passed ballot measure that caps real estate taxes. Note the article stated: The benefits of a constitutional convention, rather than a series of ballot measures, would be a more inclusive process, avoiding conflicted interests&#8230; </p>
<p>California&#8217; budge deficit and relentless history to overspend, is scaring away investors and potential employers from CA. Some employers and Investors believe CA is no longer safe to invest money. What investors do see, is a growing welfare state that will continually raise taxes. Until CA gets serious about enforcing budget restraints, many investors and potential employers will not consider California. It is foreseeable, that if a Health Insurance Bill is passed, unauthorized immigrants not covered by Health Insurance might burden CA taxpayer paid medical services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
